Please reply with agenda items and +1s for tomorrow's meeting
I would like to get an answer to whether we want to determine a register's value type from its bitfield type (RegisterLongName) or keep them separate <https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/4001#discussion_r1619542913>. On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 5:56 PM Hudson Ayers <hudayers@gmail.com> wrote:
Please reply with agenda items and +1s for tomorrow's meeting _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@lists.tockos.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.tockos.org
Hudson Ayers <hudayers@gmail.com> writes:
Please reply with agenda items and +1s for tomorrow's meeting
I want to bring up Alistair's proposal for 64-bit timers again, now that we are about to merge a new alarm driver implementation that properly conveys left-justified 32-bit ticks values to userspace: timer: Add support for 64-bit timers https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3343 Two other PRs that haven't seen activity for some time: - syscall: add notification mechanism (https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3252) - [RFC] Yield-WaitFor syscall (https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3577) It'd be great if more people took a look at the alarm capsule rewrite. It's a tough subsystem to get right. capsules/alarm: left-justify 32 bit ticks, re-architect alarm, add unit tests (https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3975)
participants (3)
-
Hudson Ayers
-
Johnathan Van Why
-
Leon Schuermann