Call for Tock meeting agenda items
Please reply with agenda items and +1s for today's meeting. Hudson is away today, so I'll be leading, hence the later than usual request for agenda items. Luckily I think there are plenty. I suggest at least: - Brad's suggestion for a new documentation working group (there is already approval for this, but we can maybe discuss whether/how to support this kind of process more generally. could be very brief)
- Process Checking Infrastructure PRs - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3772 - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3818 - Remove a nightly feature - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3803 - Finalize Legal TRD - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3821 On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 11:07 AM Amit Levy <amit@amitlevy.com> wrote:
Please reply with agenda items and +1s for today's meeting.
Hudson is away today, so I'll be leading, hence the later than usual request for agenda items. Luckily I think there are plenty. I suggest at least:
- Brad's suggestion for a new documentation working group (there is already approval for this, but we can maybe discuss whether/how to support this kind of process more generally. could be very brief) _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@lists.tockos.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.tockos.org
Ideas for today: - Stable Rust - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3802 - Signature HIL - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3772 - libtock-c refresh - How to make it more user friendly? - What types of changes would make libtock-c easier to use? Where are the pain points? - Do we need yield-wait-for-x? - Should we copy some existing interface? - We probably aren't going to be able to do an entire rewrite, but are there manageable steps that would make a difference? On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 11:24 AM Brad Campbell <bradjc@virginia.edu> wrote:
- Process Checking Infrastructure PRs - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3772 - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3818 - Remove a nightly feature - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3803 - Finalize Legal TRD - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3821
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 11:07 AM Amit Levy <amit@amitlevy.com> wrote:
Please reply with agenda items and +1s for today's meeting.
Hudson is away today, so I'll be leading, hence the later than usual request for agenda items. Luckily I think there are plenty. I suggest at least:
- Brad's suggestion for a new documentation working group (there is already approval for this, but we can maybe discuss whether/how to support this kind of process more generally. could be very brief) _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@lists.tockos.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.tockos.org
Unfortunately I have to leave at half past today. - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3849 - Async process loader - How to get PRs commented on or merged? - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3817 - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3836 - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3843 - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3846 - Looking for ideas here...do we need a new review process? All core members are supposed to comment within 7 days. - My forever quest to start supporting signed processes: https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3772 :( - libtock-c refactor proposal - https://github.com/tock/libtock-c/blob/libtock-folders/doc/guide.md - libtock-c - Don't compile extern libraries with -Werror: https://github.com/tock/libtock-c/pull/368 On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 9:21 AM Brad Campbell <bradjc@virginia.edu> wrote:
Ideas for today:
- Stable Rust - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3802 - Signature HIL - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3772 - libtock-c refresh - How to make it more user friendly? - What types of changes would make libtock-c easier to use? Where are the pain points? - Do we need yield-wait-for-x? - Should we copy some existing interface? - We probably aren't going to be able to do an entire rewrite, but are there manageable steps that would make a difference?
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 11:24 AM Brad Campbell <bradjc@virginia.edu> wrote:
- Process Checking Infrastructure PRs - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3772 - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3818 - Remove a nightly feature - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3803 - Finalize Legal TRD - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3821
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 11:07 AM Amit Levy <amit@amitlevy.com> wrote:
Please reply with agenda items and +1s for today's meeting.
Hudson is away today, so I'll be leading, hence the later than usual request for agenda items. Luckily I think there are plenty. I suggest at least:
- Brad's suggestion for a new documentation working group (there is already approval for this, but we can maybe discuss whether/how to support this kind of process more generally. could be very brief) _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@lists.tockos.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.tockos.org
Topics I would like to discuss for this week: - Digest HIL updates https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3866 - Both digests and digest implementations are now strongly templated on a particular algorithm, rather than just the length of the resulting digest. - This is motivated by being able to strongly type cryptographic signatures to a particular digest type. - Kernel testing - RFC: "Configuration" boards. These would be "mini" boards with enough functionality to test different configurations of the Tock kernel. https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3873 - Trait to wrap capsule tests: https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3871. This allows the test runner to learn when a test has finished, since the test might run many async calls. - Static mut and updating nightly - We currently cannot compile the kernel on the latest nightly: https://github.com/tock/tock/issues/3841 - We don't want to get stuck on an old version of rust, and it seems like rust wants us to tackle this problem now. - Is anyone willing to develop a "SyncCell" (or whatever the correct name is)? I propose we put a time bound on this, and use the rust-suggested "fix" if we don't have anything better so we can update nightly. - PRs - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3855 - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3859 - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3843 - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3869 - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3860 On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 9:28 AM Brad Campbell <bradjc@virginia.edu> wrote:
Unfortunately I have to leave at half past today.
- https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3849 - Async process loader - How to get PRs commented on or merged? - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3817 - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3836 - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3843 - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3846 - Looking for ideas here...do we need a new review process? All core members are supposed to comment within 7 days. - My forever quest to start supporting signed processes: https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3772 :( - libtock-c refactor proposal - https://github.com/tock/libtock-c/blob/libtock-folders/doc/guide.md - libtock-c - Don't compile extern libraries with -Werror: https://github.com/tock/libtock-c/pull/368
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 9:21 AM Brad Campbell <bradjc@virginia.edu> wrote:
Ideas for today:
- Stable Rust - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3802 - Signature HIL - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3772 - libtock-c refresh - How to make it more user friendly? - What types of changes would make libtock-c easier to use? Where are the pain points? - Do we need yield-wait-for-x? - Should we copy some existing interface? - We probably aren't going to be able to do an entire rewrite, but are there manageable steps that would make a difference?
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 11:24 AM Brad Campbell <bradjc@virginia.edu> wrote:
- Process Checking Infrastructure PRs - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3772 - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3818 - Remove a nightly feature - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3803 - Finalize Legal TRD - https://github.com/tock/tock/pull/3821
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 11:07 AM Amit Levy <amit@amitlevy.com> wrote:
Please reply with agenda items and +1s for today's meeting.
Hudson is away today, so I'll be leading, hence the later than usual request for agenda items. Luckily I think there are plenty. I suggest at least:
- Brad's suggestion for a new documentation working group (there is already approval for this, but we can maybe discuss whether/how to support this kind of process more generally. could be very brief) _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@lists.tockos.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.tockos.org
participants (2)
-
Amit Levy -
Brad Campbell